Ok, I figured out what was causing my weird behavior in IE6 – though I’m not sure why it cropped up in that browser and not IE7 or Firefox.
Seems my StatCounter was causing the issue. As soon as I moved the java script from the sidebar of the site to the main portion – the problem when away. Oh well, you can’t figure them all out. 🙂
Anyway – the site should be working fine now in IE6, though I’ll have to wait a few days to see if my stats are working correctly! Again, sorry for any confusion!
Want to see something cool?Scoble has linked to a very neat prototype site that Microsoft Live.com is working on. An actual street-level view of San Francisco and Seattle (more cities to come), where you can move down most any street and see not only “storefronts” but the actual street-level-views as if you were walking or driving the street. Very cool.
This is the kind of stuff that Microsoft is good at and should leverage more often. My hat is off to MS on this one – very nicely done & performance was quite good as well.
Or something in the site code anyway. Interesting results in Internet Explorer here on RickMahn.com. When viewed with IE6, the site’s sidebar is displayed below the last post information (and to the right – that part is correct). When viewed with Firefox and IE7, the sidebar is in the correct position – so I’m not sure what is causing the issue.
Obviously I’m going to have to comb through the code for the body and sidebar sections to really understand what is happening. Strange that it renders correctly in the beta version of IE7 and not in IE6.
IE7 however has a different issue. the top banner is displayed while the page is being rendered, then it disappears when the page is just about completely loaded.
Now I can hear all the Firefox users saying “so, what’s the problem” – and I’d like to leave it at that. However, I do like to have everyting working as it should and I’ll have to admit my main browser (still) is IE, though I’ll admit to using FF on an alarmingly increasing rate.
Anyway – just wanted to let you know that I’ll be working on the sidebar issue to correct the problem. 🙂
So I’m going to try to not get into the Old Media/New Media thing too much, but I was just reading a post by Kent Newsome over on his blog. In it, he talks about how some “old media” writers/journalists keep predicting the passing of blogging popularity, and how they believe interest in blogging is waning.
Now I understand that over the last several years the buzz about blogging has reached a fever pitch and has some media types running scared. That the trends in readership of information of many types is moving to new media outlets – namely blogs. Tie that in with Richard Edelman’s recent discussion about the Me2 Revolution, and you can see how traditional media types could be concerned that what they have to say is not being heard the way the would like it to be.
Like many industries in our modern age, digital publishing is facing the same comoditization and automation of their product that so many other industries have already experienced. What is hard to see for everyone who goes through this initial phase of change is that the end-product will be better for everyone involved. The writing of all participants will improve, the content of the writing will improve, the thinking behind what we all say will improve, the conversation will improve, etc…
Similarly, look at how the RIAA views digital music as a threat instead of a new distribution model that they could leverage to their benefit (give me $.10/track downloads and a premium “offline” CD-type product option). Or how the traditional telephony companies are running scared at how VoIP is rendering their decades-old voice lines obsolete (don’t worry about content, just sell me the cheapest, fastest internet pipe – do what you do best). What it simply means to these industires, and “old media” alike, is that they need to change. To think anew – come up with a new way to leverage the opportunity in front of them. Realize that the increased competition is worth their effort to change and improve what they currently offer.
Change is a scarry thing – especially when it has the potential to hit the bottom line, but it is also one of the most exciting events that can occur to any industry – how else can anyone improve & expand without going through some sort of change? And how many of us would like a static unchanging world anyway? Change, whether small or large is what keeps us all interested. What keeps us all coming back for more.
Come visit me at my new permanent Blog on the net at RickMahn.com. I’ll problably not be updating this space regularly as I’ve consolidated all my blogging efforts into one site. You can see some of the latest post headlines below.
An article over at The Wireless Report covers some new developments in the Cable vs. municiple wireless “battle”. There are some efforts being pursued by CableLabs (an industry trade group) where they investigate competing in the wireless space.
This is a good thing – the cable industry is taking the correct approach in trying to compete with the new competition rather than continue to lobby against something that is a direct threat to their business model. New competition should always be viewed as a challenge to improve, to become better than before rather than the knee-jerk reaction of protect our market share at all costs kind of mentality.
I encourage the cable industry to keep trying to think further ahead, as well as their competion – it will make the resulting products and services that much more useful and valuable to us consumers.
John Thune is a giant wiener. He just said that he doesn’t have the votes to end the filibuster.
WHOSE FAULT IS THAT, JOHN???
80% of Americans - Republicans and Democrats - want voter ID. And Thune is just standing there, bragging about getting the Democrats "on record" without
And this is why the left is burning down our cities and assassinating our leaders. Free speech is more powerful than a bullet. Truth lives forever, while assassins decay in the dirt.
