Blog

Thoughts and things I care to share

links for 2007-03-16

Google Phone is Real

A Google executive has confirmed the existence of a Google Phone project.  Some analysts believe this is a different project than has been reported in recent weeks, focusing on developing countries a viable affordable smartphone option.

Via: Phone ScoopGoogle Exec Says Company Is Working On Phone

D2 – The New Corporate Desktop

Business DesktopSo why “D2” you ask? It stands for “Desktop 2.0”, which is of course, a play on Web 2.0. While there have been many predictions and suggestions, I want to take this opportunity and posit my opinion of where the corporate or enterprise desktop solutions should be heading. My poor coworkers have got to be tired of hearing my pitches and ideas on this by now!

In a nutshell, I believe Window Vista to be the last large-scale revision and release of the operating system. As such, corporations need to figure out whether they want to continue the upgrade cycle of Microsoft’s high-maintenance operating system. Or, choose to go a different path to secure their data, lower management costs of their client systems, and bring more areas of the business under the business continuity (disaster recovery) umbrella.

To accomplish this, businesses need to look at the pros and cons of both options and take a hard look at their computing needs. The solution for a manufacturing company that merely needs to track production, finance and sales does not have the computing requirements of, say an engineering firm where most of the employees require high-powered CAD/CAM software solutions.

The problem with the traditional desktop is not the initial cost for the hardware, installation, software licensing and so on. Its obviously the ongoing support costs, hardware replacement, service calls, and much more depending on how skilled your technical staff is.

In another world with the proper use of terminal services or Citrix server farms, data replication, thin clients, system virtualization, and load balancing, a company could eliminate or significantly reduce the reliance in traditional desktops and laptops. The key thing to focus on is not reducing cost so much as realizing that you can take control and secure your data. You can create an environment where all data is backed up at your central hub and backup locations that you currently use. (Just think of all those unsecured hard drives that aren’t backed up storing, in some cases, critical business data!) You can also reduce or eliminate the complexity of supporting the Windows operating system.

Yes, Microsoft has made great strides in managing and deploying the operating system, but you do know that you will need to deploy yet another server system to manage the licensing of Windows Vista – right? Did you know that the methods for deploying Vista is different than deploying Windows 2000 & XP? Yep, start planning a big upgrade budget, even if you choose to slipstream the OS, you’ll need to plan the deployment infrastructure out properly. (*Shameless plug* Contact me if you want some consulting done on this – its what I do as an Infrastructure Architect and Analyst smile_wink ).

There is a better way, and it doesn’t need to be the standard Windows desktop – also think about what Apple has been doing with the Mac lately, or Linux – several distributions have really made huge usability strides in the last few years. Do I have a chip on my shoulder regarding Vista – not really, but I think there are more solutions today than when Windows XP was fresh and new and the focus of everyone’s attention. I just think that the proliferation of web-based applications, increased bandwidth, robustness of terminal services, and the flexibility of virtualization, that there can be a simpler corporate environment than we have today.

links for 2007-03-15

RIP Twitter – A Rebuttal

So while reading Twitter this morning, I ran across a link from Steve Rubel to this blog post that is predicting the demise of Twitter.  Whether this will turn out to be true or not, I can’t predict. 

Twitter will flame-out before the end of 2007, in one of the most awe-inspiring lessons in irrational exuberance we’ve seen since the turn of the millennium.

However, I do take issue with one or two points in this posting.  Below are the points Mat Balez of web1979 posits, and my rebuttal to them.

1. Where’s the Value? There is no substance to the house of cards that is Twitter. No deep content, nothing to learn, no reason to keep coming back to the trough, other than the thrill/obsession of pre-adolescent voyeurism – which is simply not reason enough for busy professionals. I’ve not seen a single legitimate, value-generating use of Twitter explained or demonstrated.

Where’s the value – No deep content?  The going’s on of many interesting and influential people, committed to transparency in the conversation talk about everything and nothing.  The number of links to great content on blogs and other sites is huge if you pay attention.  I’ve found more interesting blogs in just one week of Twittering than several months of reading blogs and feeds – that is value.

2. Too Much Effort People are lazy. Anything that requires too much time, effort and attention simply won’t succeed in a sustainable way unless it’s tremendously valuable (which Twitter is not, see #1).

What?  What could be simpler than a one-sentence blog post?  How is this too much effort?  You can put as much time into it as you want to get the value you need.  For instance, in just a few minutes this morning, I found this article that inspired my blog posting today.  In another minute or two I found this, this, and this.  How is it too much effort for the value it returned to me in just under 10 minutes?

3. Key Users Will Bail Ah, the double-edged sword of network effects. I suspect that once the community anchors in Twitterati start to give up on it (and they will; wait for the SXSW hangover to take effect) it won’t take long for the entire house to crumble.

This is possible.  If a person does not see the value, or get any return on their time investment, they will stop using the service.  If they get overwhelmed by the chatter that may not be relevant to them, they will stop using the service.  Or if one of their favorite A-Listers chooses to stop using the service, do people follow their lead?  That could be the one area that could trip up Twitter.

In the end, we’ll find out if Twitter has staying power over the long term.  There are definitely things that could be improved upon, features that could add more value, or too many things could be tried on the Twitter user base that hinders the simple usability that everyone I’ve interacted with loves about the service.  Time will tell, but to suggest that there is no value or its too much work makes me think that someone didn’t try to look very hard.

links for 2007-03-14

links for 2007-03-13

Quotes


Be strong.

Be of good courage.

God bless America.

Long live the republic.

Sootch00

Lessons cost money. Good one's cost lots.

Tony Beets

Hard times make strong men.

Strong men make good times.

Good times make weak men.

Weak men make hard times.

Unknown

You're only worth what you're willing to work for.

Wranglerstar

You can watch things happen, you can make things happen, or you can wonder what happened.

Capt. Phil Harris

People say I have an issue with control... I say, as long as I have it, there is no issue.

Unknown

Mistakes are just success training.

DarwinOnTheTrail

Life begins at the end of your comfort zone.

Unknown

No man is a complete failure. He can always be used as a bad example.

Unknown

You're either the mouse or the lion. Time to find out which one.

Sue Aikens

Failure is always an option.

Adam Savage

Pin It on Pinterest