Blog
Thoughts and things I care to shareGoogle Presentation Tool?
Could be true – there may be a Google Presentation tool in the works.
Via: Google Operating System – Google’s Presentation Tool Does Exist
links for 2007-03-16
- Looking for more video search sites? Here’s a portal designed just for that. Looks kind of interesting.
- Going to Mesh 2007? Mathew Ingram notes that online video will be a big component of the conference this year.
- A short writeup on EVDO Rev. A by Katie Fehrenbacher over at GigaOM. With both Sprint and Verizon rolling out the service, there is a nice selection of plans and hardware options.
- Rafe Needleman has an excellent guide for newbie Twitters. Just started using the service? Curious on learning some shortcuts and enhanced features? Check this one out.
- Network Computing has an expose on deploying Windows Vista in enterprise environments. With the stability of Windows XP, it’s going to be a hard sell for awhile.
Rafe Needleman’s Newbie Guide to Twitter
Been wondering what all the fuss is about Twitter and how to leverage this great new service? Rafe Needleman has written an excellent guide for new users of the Twitter service.
Via: Webware – Newbie’s guide to Twitter
Google Phone is Real
A Google executive has confirmed the existence of a Google Phone project. Some analysts believe this is a different project than has been reported in recent weeks, focusing on developing countries a viable affordable smartphone option.
Via: Phone Scoop – Google Exec Says Company Is Working On Phone
D2 – The New Corporate Desktop
So why “D2” you ask? It stands for “Desktop 2.0”, which is of course, a play on Web 2.0. While there have been many predictions and suggestions, I want to take this opportunity and posit my opinion of where the corporate or enterprise desktop solutions should be heading. My poor coworkers have got to be tired of hearing my pitches and ideas on this by now!
In a nutshell, I believe Window Vista to be the last large-scale revision and release of the operating system. As such, corporations need to figure out whether they want to continue the upgrade cycle of Microsoft’s high-maintenance operating system. Or, choose to go a different path to secure their data, lower management costs of their client systems, and bring more areas of the business under the business continuity (disaster recovery) umbrella.
To accomplish this, businesses need to look at the pros and cons of both options and take a hard look at their computing needs. The solution for a manufacturing company that merely needs to track production, finance and sales does not have the computing requirements of, say an engineering firm where most of the employees require high-powered CAD/CAM software solutions.
The problem with the traditional desktop is not the initial cost for the hardware, installation, software licensing and so on. Its obviously the ongoing support costs, hardware replacement, service calls, and much more depending on how skilled your technical staff is.
In another world with the proper use of terminal services or Citrix server farms, data replication, thin clients, system virtualization, and load balancing, a company could eliminate or significantly reduce the reliance in traditional desktops and laptops. The key thing to focus on is not reducing cost so much as realizing that you can take control and secure your data. You can create an environment where all data is backed up at your central hub and backup locations that you currently use. (Just think of all those unsecured hard drives that aren’t backed up storing, in some cases, critical business data!) You can also reduce or eliminate the complexity of supporting the Windows operating system.
Yes, Microsoft has made great strides in managing and deploying the operating system, but you do know that you will need to deploy yet another server system to manage the licensing of Windows Vista – right? Did you know that the methods for deploying Vista is different than deploying Windows 2000 & XP? Yep, start planning a big upgrade budget, even if you choose to slipstream the OS, you’ll need to plan the deployment infrastructure out properly. (*Shameless plug* Contact me if you want some consulting done on this – its what I do as an Infrastructure Architect and Analyst
).
There is a better way, and it doesn’t need to be the standard Windows desktop – also think about what Apple has been doing with the Mac lately, or Linux – several distributions have really made huge usability strides in the last few years. Do I have a chip on my shoulder regarding Vista – not really, but I think there are more solutions today than when Windows XP was fresh and new and the focus of everyone’s attention. I just think that the proliferation of web-based applications, increased bandwidth, robustness of terminal services, and the flexibility of virtualization, that there can be a simpler corporate environment than we have today.
links for 2007-03-15
- Will an enhanced EDGE network help T-Mobile in 2009 while they are getting their real 3G network rolled out, or simply impead any progress on it? With Ericsson prepping an EDGE Evolution upgrade path capable of 1Mbps it would definitely be a nice fall-ba
- I’ve know of only three books or projects so far based or inspired by blogs: Naked Converstations, Lifehacker, and the upcoming Global Neighbourhood. So it’s inspiring to me that there is a whole genre of blooks (blog blogs – get it) happening. Not that
- If this doesn’t mirror what I’ve been saying for nearly 9 months now. DRM is an infeasible pipe dream, and is simply a legal mechanism to harass your existing customers and alienate new ones. Nice to see the MSM starting to “get it”.
More Computer Choices
Warner Crocker has a quick post over at GottaBeMobile showing two new Asus devices. One is a UMPC with a keyboard, the other, a new Tablet PC. Since I’m soon going to be in the market for a laptop replacement, I’m highly interested in a UMPC with a keyboard!
Via: GottaBeMobile – Asus Intros a Rugged Tablet PC and UMPC with Keyboard
RIP Twitter – A Rebuttal
So while reading Twitter this morning, I ran across a link from Steve Rubel to this blog post that is predicting the demise of Twitter. Whether this will turn out to be true or not, I can’t predict.
Twitter will flame-out before the end of 2007, in one of the most awe-inspiring lessons in irrational exuberance we’ve seen since the turn of the millennium.
However, I do take issue with one or two points in this posting. Below are the points Mat Balez of web1979 posits, and my rebuttal to them.
1. Where’s the Value? There is no substance to the house of cards that is Twitter. No deep content, nothing to learn, no reason to keep coming back to the trough, other than the thrill/obsession of pre-adolescent voyeurism – which is simply not reason enough for busy professionals. I’ve not seen a single legitimate, value-generating use of Twitter explained or demonstrated.
Where’s the value – No deep content? The going’s on of many interesting and influential people, committed to transparency in the conversation talk about everything and nothing. The number of links to great content on blogs and other sites is huge if you pay attention. I’ve found more interesting blogs in just one week of Twittering than several months of reading blogs and feeds – that is value.
2. Too Much Effort People are lazy. Anything that requires too much time, effort and attention simply won’t succeed in a sustainable way unless it’s tremendously valuable (which Twitter is not, see #1).
What? What could be simpler than a one-sentence blog post? How is this too much effort? You can put as much time into it as you want to get the value you need. For instance, in just a few minutes this morning, I found this article that inspired my blog posting today. In another minute or two I found this, this, and this. How is it too much effort for the value it returned to me in just under 10 minutes?
3. Key Users Will Bail Ah, the double-edged sword of network effects. I suspect that once the community anchors in Twitterati start to give up on it (and they will; wait for the SXSW hangover to take effect) it won’t take long for the entire house to crumble.
This is possible. If a person does not see the value, or get any return on their time investment, they will stop using the service. If they get overwhelmed by the chatter that may not be relevant to them, they will stop using the service. Or if one of their favorite A-Listers chooses to stop using the service, do people follow their lead? That could be the one area that could trip up Twitter.
In the end, we’ll find out if Twitter has staying power over the long term. There are definitely things that could be improved upon, features that could add more value, or too many things could be tried on the Twitter user base that hinders the simple usability that everyone I’ve interacted with loves about the service. Time will tell, but to suggest that there is no value or its too much work makes me think that someone didn’t try to look very hard.
links for 2007-03-14
- Richard MacManus provides an in-depth interview with Google’s Matt Cutts. Great discussion of next-gen search, custom search, and much else.
- Very interesting… If OpenOffice can get itself pre-installed on a Tier 1 vendor such as Dell, the landscape and perception of OpenSource software would drastically change.
links for 2007-03-13
- Steve Rubel has an interesting take on the recent Twitter phenomenon. Is there a limit to humans ability to absorb new media type after new media type without missing something? Good read.
- Twitter is again the topic – looks like some people actually prefer to read their favorite writers in “real time” rather than their blogs. Could this become common?