Blog
Thoughts and things I care to sharelinks for 2007-07-28
- Monica Alleven makes a good case for fair-roaming pricing for Tier 2 & 3 carriers. The “big 4” don’t always offer roaming services equally in many situations. Good read as we all think about the 700MHz Open Access/Network ideas.
- I’m not an Audio guy, but this would be nifty for advanced sound work required for podcasting and video podcasting.
links for 2007-07-27
- Hmm, guess this is one time we’re getting “first dibs” on new technology in the mobile phone world. Too bad it’s something as blah as the iPhone.
- Looks like the Twitter folks have won another round of funding from the VCs. Good. Twitter is one of those killer-apps that works simply and has the user numbers to make it work.
Change
Change, the one inexorable force that both disrupts and encourages. Change to one’s perception, to one’s abilities, and one’s fortunes is always tied to one’s future.
I am an agent of change, yet I abhor it.
I create change, but end up enduring it.
I am forced to change, and I accept it.
Where will change deposit me this time?
links for 2007-07-25
- Om Malik makes a few good points in this article. As online video develops, it will not supplant television or movies, but will augment it.
What’s yer handle
An interaction on one of the SocNets led me to think of how your online name, handle, or pseudonym can be branded. Many may remember our first introduction to personal wireless communications some 30 odd years ago via CB Radio. Interactions went something like:
Breaker good buddy, a Kojak with a Kodak waitin’ with Evil Knievel on exit 20. Catch ya on the flip side in 20. Stopin’ at the choke-n-puke for some go-go juice.
Ah, what quaint communications indeed. The CB Radio was the cell phone of its day, and the use of the device made you feel a little like a DJ, so I’ll cut it a bit of slack. At least conversations went something like that – hey I was 10, I can’t remember exactly. At any rate, it was the first time I had heard of a “handle” and it was all the rage (along with the first go-round with bell bottoms and corduroy) to come up with something outrageous to call yourself.
Here some thirty plus years later, many people still choose to use a pseudonym online in place of their real name. While I highly recommend using your own name, I do understand the reasons for not using it. Anonymity is desirable in addition to being recognized.
The point of this post, is that whatever name you choose to use online, I recommend keeping consistent in name, and the spelling of it. It doesn’t matter if you prefer a pseudonym or your name, but stick to it everywhere you go on the Internet.
Also, if you think into the future you will realize that your pseudonym may follow you into many professional endeavors. Realizing this, you may want to think about a more professional, or at least professionally acceptable pseudonym to use in crafting your brand.
After all, do you want your personal brand to appear as Your Chosen Brand or “rubber ducky”.
10-4 Good Buddy!
links for 2007-07-24
- A question from a Minneapolis individual made it to the CNN/YouTube debate – pretty cool. It was recorded and posted by UpTake a project that involves videoblogger Chuck Olsen in Minneapolis.
- This is quite exciting, I’ll be investigating Zoho CRM for Avatar Consultants and/or my own independent consulting gigs.
- You are aware of some of Facebook’s more “interesting” legal quirks in its EULA… don’t you?
- Paul Kapustka from GigaOM steps up and analyzes Google’s entrance into telecommunications lobbying in front of the FCC.
Scary Wireless Stories
Are you a wireless communications carrier in the US? Then I have a very scary revelation to share with you.
You’re about to loose control. You will lose control of your network, its devices, and your customers.
Will you throw an infantile temper-tantrum like the RIAA and threaten/bully/sue your customers into compliance?
Or will you be a leader in the industry and embrace the concept of an open network and make it easy for your customers to come & go as they choose?
I admit it’s a frightening proposition to contemplate. However, accepting the notion of an open network will allow you to provide more innovative, better quality, and a larger number of interesting services.
links for 2007-07-23
- More rumor talk of Vista SP1
- Better check your Java installations, make sure to keep on top of this as it develops – watch for patches.
- James Kendrick points to an interesting and potentially useful utility for managing large files.
- More input on the upcoming FCC auction for the 700MHz spectrum. I’ve got a post for later on this topic as well.
links for 2007-07-22
- More perspectives on the potential Google participation in the 700MHz FCC Auction. Hopefully this will take place – the open network that is. I would like more companies than just Google to get spectrum, but all have to abide by the open network rules t
- Interesting take on Motorola’s current predicament. Wonder what’s up with Moto, and yes the MPx would’ve been UberCool 3 years ago when the concept was shown.
- The NYT covers the inability to migrate phone and apps from wireless carrier to wireless carrier pretty well.
- Did you read the fine print on that spiffy iPhone/AT&T contract?
- You do know the rumors about MS licensing changes – don’t you? Shouldn’t be a surprise.
Nice Networking
I’ve had this great experience over the last few days, networking and meeting dozens of people in Chris Brogan’s Grasshoppers group. An amazing social networking group that started life as a Facebook group, attracting somewhere in the neighborhood of 700 members in about 72 hours (someone correct me if I’m off on that).
The main concept of Grasshoppers is that it really has no structure and is only there to help each other. Got a question, toss it to the group. Need to find a talented PHP coder – ask the group. Need help finding equipment to donate for a good cause – ask the group. Grasshoppers is meant to be a dynamic association to help with just about anything, anywhere. Interesting group!
Recently Chris has created a Grasshoppers social network for the group over on Ning, and while we’re sure to loose some members in the transition, people really interested will make the jump. Some (even notable bloggers) have possibly mistaken the move as an intent to spread the Grasshoppers group to as many platforms as possible. That’s furthest from the realities. As a group of people, not a function of software, the group needed more options to get at the information the group is creating, and Facebook doesn’t account for that very well. At least not yet.
If you interested in a networking group that doesn’t place demands on your time, respects your skills, and participation level, then check out the Grasshoppers group. It’s also a great way to add contacts and extend your networking as well.